Answer about which water ionizer Karl Heinz Asenbaum uses at home:
“I am constantly testing new devices. I'm currently finding it AquaVolta® Moses preferably."
Addition by Yasin Akgün:
I can also add that Karl Heinz Asenbaum uses IONIA® from the same manufacturer AquaVolta® ECA Plus water ionizer
By downloading the video you accept the privacy policy of YouTube.
Read more
The real question | Heavy metals and ionization of heavy metals in the water ionizer
Thank you very much, it is noted.
I know what you think about osmosis water and that this has degenerated into a kind of religious war. But I don't even want to identify with someone like that because I'm always open to new things. Since I value your opinion very much, I would like to give you a point of view that is not easy to ignore (at least for me) and that, if you want to look at it scientifically and strive for the optimum in quality, you inevitably has to deal with the topic.
I agree with you 100% with all of your arguments for and against RO technology. It is not necessary in itself, as dissolved minerals are also needed for the further processing process in the ionizer and they are actually very important.
However, this approval requires that the source medium must be uncontaminated in its original form, which cannot be achieved technically by the waterworks alone. We are talking here about an extremely increasing heavy metal particle load, which is in the nano range and neither from the waterworks nor from the filters in the ionizers (which only filter out the worst - particles of 1µ, while a membrane is capable of filtering out particles of 0,0001 micron) can be achieved. These nanoparticles pass through the blood-brain barrier without any difficulty and reach regions where they absolutely do not belong.
So at the end of the day you may not have quite as nice/high numbers or values and also an increased effort due to the remineralization, but you still have the certainty that no, or a greatly reduced, heavy metal spectrum has ended up in the water, which is not belongs in the body and, as you yourself say, “could be made even more dangerous by ionization”.
I don't want to convert anyone or force an opinion, but I would find it interesting if you could briefly comment on these arguments, perhaps also pointing out whether additional minerals would be needed in addition to the mineral mixture to remineralize 80 mg of calcium and 20 mg of magnesium and whether This information refers to one liter of water.
Thank you for the exchange and your perspective
Kind regards
MS
Answer from Karl Heinz Asenbaum about water filtration and heavy metals and air quality
Dear Mr. Seifert,
If heavy metals are still found after filtration, you must use a stronger filter performance, if necessary reverse osmosis with calcium + Mg (magnesium) post-mineralization. In this case, I actually recommend reverse osmosis.
But I have probably seen more than 1000 analyzes that examined heavy metals after the filter of a water ionizer. Of these, less than 5% were such candidates.
I tend to only advise customers on the most necessary measures. Nobody should spend more money than they have to. In my experience, your statements about the heavy metal contamination of drinking water in Europe, even after normal filtration, only apply to 5% of water intake points.
I also generally warn against overestimating the danger at the wrong risk point. By far the greatest amount of heavy metal pollution comes from the air, and not from drinking water. With mercury, the worst of all heavy metals, it travels directly to the brain via the olfactory nerve. That's why I think an air ionizer is just as important as a water ionizer. I have one in every room.
With kind regards,
Karl Heinz Asenbaum
Answer from MS About air purification and heavy metals
Of course, I agree with you about overestimating the danger at the wrong risk point. If you were to adapt this sterile standard to other living conditions, you would have to live in a clean room and would no longer be allowed to leave it. I put 3 of the following products in my room:
www.aquacentrum.de/shop/zoomius-luftreiniger-auf-oel-bzw-wasser-waelzbasis/
But I don't really know yet whether they really get more than dust out of the air. Hence mixed feelings. I've read a lot of frightening things about air ionizers, which led me to buy oil-based air purifiers. For example, in Amazon “The device not only emits ions, but also the gas ozone. This gave me a strong dry cough... Smokers should definitely google thoroughly before making a purchase decision, as there is a study about possible additional lung damage.” Since this could of course just be targeted disinformation, I am open to new information here too.
Are there any videos or information material from you regarding air ionizers? From what I understand, you have probably looked into it intensively beforehand, so the question is which product convinced you?
Regards
M. Seifert
