Your important FAQ on dosage questions about hydrogen water and inhalation

Your important FAQ on dosage questions about hydrogen water and inhalation

Good afternoon Mr. Asenbaum

You are becoming more and more right about many of the things you predicted years ago about water.

I would therefore like to ask myself how much drinking water should be enriched with the Aqua Volt Turbo Booster for health purposes. How much PPB? There are devices that achieve a hydrogen concentration of 800 - 1200 PPB, measured in ppb/m? What level of enrichment makes sense or what area? Is there a risk of undesirable side effects if too much hydrogen is accumulated or is this not possible at all due to the physical properties of water?

A colleague from China, a herbal specialist and naturopath who worked at a Swiss hospital for 3 months, pointed out to me that the best thing at the moment for many diseases and problems and also for prevention is an HHO machine for inhalation. Must achieve at least 3000ml/minute, ie 2000 h2 1000 o. The best devices in China would already achieve 6000 ml/m. We had very good success with Covid 19. As far as I know, the Aqua Volt machine produces 3000 ml/m. What is the ideal area of ​​application for inhalation? Does it make sense to go beyond the ratio of 2000 h2 to 1000 o or what are the ideal ratios below that? Does the strength of inhalation (high proportion of h2 to o) depend on the health effect you want to achieve or does the body only absorb what it can process.

Is your Aqua Volt Turbo Booster available?

Thank you very much for an answer.

O. Müller

Hello Mr. Müller,
Thank you very much for your important questions, which I will be happy to answer based on what we know at the end of November 2023.
First, to drink hydrogen-rich water. To evaluate it, you first have to know exactly what the terms ppm (or ppb) mean. These are relative terms. Ppm means parts per million and ppb is parts per billion. If you have 250 ml of water with 1 ppm (=1000 ppb), which corresponds to a normal drinking portion, you will only consume 0,25 mg of hydrogen with this portion. This is too little. The hydrogen medicine specialist organization www.intlhsa.org/standards/ requires at least 0,5 mg per serving.

This is also the reason why water ionizers, which are mostly limited in this area, are gradually going out of fashion. Instead, I recommend hydrogen boosters like the Aquavolta Turbo. It makes 5 ppm in 3 minutes and 10 ppm in 6 minutes. This corresponds to 250 mg or 0,75 mg of hydrogen per drinking portion of 1,5 ml, which is well above the minimum dose.

A daily dose of 3 mg can be considered optimal for oral hydrogen therapy. With 4 drinking portions of 0,75 mg each you can achieve the optimal daily dose. If you can't manage to drink 1 liter of water a day, you can drink just half a liter at 6 ppm.

Drinking more or drinking higher ppm levels makes no sense at all: because the hydrogen is absorbed into the blood in the small intestine, where there is a different absorption limit for each individual. Anything that is ingested in excess is exhaled through the lungs in just a few minutes.

The same applies to inhalation, although there are very large differences in size. Even an inhaler that delivers just 100 ml per minute provides 9 mg of hydrogen gas in one minute. This corresponds exactly to the optimal therapeutic requirement of 3 mg, because we only breathe in for a third of the inhalation time, another third is the breathing pause and the last third is the exhalation.

H2 inhalation is different from drinking hydrogen-rich water.

1. Inhalation skips the mouth, throat, esophagus, stomach, duodenum and small intestine, where the oral drinking hydrogen is absorbed. Therefore, for all diseases that affect these body segments, there are usually better results with drinking hydrogen-rich water.
2. The most recommended 30-minute inhalation not only provides a hydrogen boost, but also a permanently increased hydrogen level in the blood and distributes it to the organs in a known order. This can enable longer recovery phases, especially for organs that are under increased oxidative stress due to illness.
3. Organs such as the lungs, breathing tube, mouth and nose can also benefit from drinking hydrogen-rich water, as excess hydrogen is also exhaled from the lungs. However, compared to the amounts that occur through inhalation, this is of little relevance, especially in respiratory diseases.

H2/O2 inhalation

In principle, hydrogen inhalation is always an inhalation of the two gases hydrogen and oxygen, because the hydrogen is not inhaled pure (otherwise you would suffocate), but rather mixed with the natural 21 percent oxygen air. Normally only about 4% hydrogen is added to minimize the risk of fire and explosion. This causes the oxygen content of the inhaled gas to drop by less than 1%, which is often described as the “altitude training effect,” which results in a desirable increase in red blood cell counts, also known in the sports world as “EPO doping.” Ultimately, we only need 18% oxygen to breathe, so the usual <4% H2 inhalation cannot cause shortness of breath under any circumstances. But what if there is already shortness of breath, as in the case of a severe pneumonia like COVID 19? What if a large part of the alveoli is already blocked by lung mucus and the standard therapy would be to give pure oxygen to compensate for the respiratory deficit? In such a case, it seems sensible to also increase oxygen at the expense of nitrogen or carbon dioxide. In China, this was tried during the Corona pandemic and 2000 devices were used that added 4000 ml of hydrogen and 2000 ml of oxygen per minute to the air the sick people breathed. There was a success story about it. but in the end the Chinese researchers only published data on only around 100 patients, so not only I, but also my American friend Tyler W. LeBaron asked: "Where is the data?" We both publicly supported this method in videos. Today we have doubts. I think 666 ml of hydrogen/minute is acceptable. But without adding additional oxygen. On the one hand, there is the considerable safety risk. 4000 ml of hydrogen + 2000 ml of oxygen per minute is 6 liters of oxyhydrogen per minute, which can cause a devastating detonation in the event of an unforeseen ignition. Risk management is very complex. Because with an average minute ventilation volume of 6-8 liters, almost pure oxyhydrogen gas comes into the lungs - and most of it comes out of the lungs again. A single electrostatic discharge can ignite this highly dangerous mixture if it is not defused first by ventilation systems. I can therefore completely disagree with your Chinese colleague. Firstly, I only recommend H2 inhalers with a maximum of 667 ml/min H2 flow. Secondly, except in the case of acute pneumonia and O2 ventilation is required, I generally only recommend pure H2 ventilation. H2/O2 mixtures, if they actually have to be used due to the risk of suffocation, should be absolutely pure and obtained from PEM generators based on the purest laboratory water. HHO (Brown's gas) is obtained from alkaline electrolysis, i.e. from a lye. No such device that I know of has medical approval in the Western world. These devices are only known and approved in welding technology. In addition to H2 and O2, HHO has other components in the vapor that some people consider to have special properties. There is no scientific evidence for this. Therefore, I strongly advise against using these devices for anything other than welding purposes. We now know how hydrogen works. We should only supplement its antioxidant effect with the “countergas” oxygen in necessary emergencies. Under no circumstances should we use impure gases such as HHO for therapy.